COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicentre randomised trial.

European Urology 2007 November
OBJECTIVES: This prospective, multicentre, randomised study compared the safety and success rate of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and transobturator tape (TOT) in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS: Of 148 women, 73 were randomised to TVT and 75 to TOT. Preoperative workups included case history, clinical examination, Urogenital Distress Inventory and Impact Incontinence Quality of life questionnaires, 1-h pad test, pelvic ultrasound, and urodynamics. Intra- and postoperative complications were the primary end point; subjective and objective changes in SUI, and postoperative voiding dysfunctions were secondary end points. Patients were classified into two main categories: dry (no leakage during clinical and/or stress test and/or reported by patients) versus wet. Patients who referred being wet were separated into "improved" or "failure" on subjective analysis. Other outcome variables were quality of life questionnaires and VAS scale. Clinical checkups were conducted at 3, 6, 12 mo, and then annually.

RESULTS: Both techniques are safe and no significant differences emerged in intra- and postoperative complications. At a mean follow-up of 31 mo, the overall objective cure (dry) was 71.4% for TVT and 77.3% for TOT (p=ns). When one considered "dry" plus "wet but improved," these values increased to 90% and 90.6%, respectively (p=ns). Median satisfaction rate was 9 (range: 1-10) for both procedures. Postoperative storage symptoms are a controversial issue; they persisted in 44% of patients in TVT group versus 24% in TOT group (p<0.053).

CONCLUSIONS: TOT appears as safe and effective as TVT in surgery for female SUI, with minimal complications at mean follow-up of 31 mo.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app