Electronic medical records for the orthopaedic practice

Ian Alexander
Clinical Orthopaedics and related Research 2007, 457: 114-9
Electronic medical records (EMR) will be the standard method of medical documentation within the next decade. Making the conversion from paper to digital records will be costly in terms of actual cash outlay for an EMR system and the time investment in staff training, conversion of existing records and loss of operational efficiency during the implementation phase. The most difficult part of converting to EMR is ensuring the system you select will meet your practice's current objectives and those in years to come as technology--and the general population's adoption of it--changes. There are tremendous opportunities for current and future technologies to improve efficiency and reduce practice overhead, but selecting a system with limitations may make it difficult to realize these potentials. My aims are to: (1) explain why an EMR will be important to an orthopaedic practice and establish goals of EMR conversion; (2) outline attributes desirable in an EMR system; and (3) provide some insight regarding future direction of EMR.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article


You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.


Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"