Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The value of preoperative vascular imaging in the selection and success of hemodialysis access.

The purpose of this study was to determine the value of preoperative vascular imaging (PVI) in the selection of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis with respect to site selection, maturation, patency, and functionality. We retrospectively evaluated 482 AVFs and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) created in 321 patients who were regularly undergoing hemodialysis at our university's hemodialysis centers. The patients were divided into two groups according to PVI status. The patients in group 1 (n = 260) underwent Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation and venographic studies as well as physical examination before operation. The patients in group 2 (n = 222) underwent only physical examination before operation. Both groups were compared with respect to vascular access type, access maturation rate, and duration of access patency. In group 1, central veins were also evaluated for possible stenosis, and significant asymptomatic stenosis was treated with interventional techniques. The patients in group 1 were significantly older than those in group 2 and had a significantly higher mean number of previous central venous catheterizations and vascular access sites. At the initiation of the study, 234 of the vascular access sites had matured with a success rate of 90% in group 1. In group 2, however, 152 (68.5%) of the vascular access sites had matured. AVGs of the vascular access type were created in 31.5% of patients in group 1 and in 12.6% of patients in group 2. The mean duration of primary patency in group 1 overall (i.e., AVFs and AVGs) was 14.7 +/- 16.8 months, and the 6-month and 12-month patency rates were 72% and 46%, respectively. The mean duration of primary patency in group 2 overall was 11.9 +/- 9.4 months, and the 6-month and 12-month patency rates were 71% and 41%, respectively. Patients in group 1 had a significantly longer mean primary patency time than did those in group 2 (P = 0.024). Sixty-six cases of central vein stenosis were detected during PVI studies and treated interventionally. After those interventions, 38 AVFs and 28 AVGs were created, and all matured sufficiently without exception. As an adjunct to physical examination, PVI evaluations (venography, Doppler ultrasonography) can be used to determine the likelihood of the maturation of vascular access sites and can reveal problems such as central vein stenosis, which can then be treated promptly with percutaneous intervention. In patients with end-stage renal disease, these interventions should lead to a decrease in morbidity and mortality and improved quality of life.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app