We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients.
Spine 2007 March 2
STUDY DESIGN: A reliability study was conducted in quantitative 3-dimensional (3D) measurements for mild scoliosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intrarater and interrater reliability of a computer tool used for 3D reconstruction of the spine.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No reliability study of spinal in vivo 3D medical imaging measurements has been performed in the literature.
METHODS: This study included 30 patients (mean age 13 years) with mild idiopathic scoliosis. Spinal 3D reconstruction was performed using a new technique called semiautomatic 3D reconstruction, which requires only the location of the corners of each vertebral body on 2 orthogonal views. Three raters performed the 3D reconstruction procedure on the 30 pairs of radiographs in random order. One of the raters repeated the procedure for the 30 patients 15 days later. Inter-reliability and intra-reliability were estimated for different parameters: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, Cobb's angle, pelvic morphologic and positional parameters, and axial rotation.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient showed good or very good agreement for most of the measurements. The 95% prediction limits are approximately 4 degrees for the measurements of spinal curves, 2 degrees for pelvic parameters, and axial vertebral rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine is acceptable, and this technique can be used for clinical studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intrarater and interrater reliability of a computer tool used for 3D reconstruction of the spine.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No reliability study of spinal in vivo 3D medical imaging measurements has been performed in the literature.
METHODS: This study included 30 patients (mean age 13 years) with mild idiopathic scoliosis. Spinal 3D reconstruction was performed using a new technique called semiautomatic 3D reconstruction, which requires only the location of the corners of each vertebral body on 2 orthogonal views. Three raters performed the 3D reconstruction procedure on the 30 pairs of radiographs in random order. One of the raters repeated the procedure for the 30 patients 15 days later. Inter-reliability and intra-reliability were estimated for different parameters: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, Cobb's angle, pelvic morphologic and positional parameters, and axial rotation.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient showed good or very good agreement for most of the measurements. The 95% prediction limits are approximately 4 degrees for the measurements of spinal curves, 2 degrees for pelvic parameters, and axial vertebral rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine is acceptable, and this technique can be used for clinical studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app