JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prediction of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section and its relation to the effect of crystalloid or colloid preload.

BACKGROUND: If parturients prone to develop caval compression in the supine position were identified before delivery, this might be a method of predicting hypotension during caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Colloid preloading is superior to crystalloid in reducing the risk for spinal anesthetic-induced hypotension. It is postulated that parturients preoperatively susceptible to the supine position would benefit the most from colloid preloading.

METHODS: Fifty-five healthy parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were preoperatively investigated with a supine stress test with measurement of maternal heart rate, blood pressure, right uterine artery pulsatility index and symptoms in the left lateral and supine positions. They were then randomized to receive a colloid or crystalloid preload before anesthesia.

RESULTS: The stress test was positive, indicating a reduced tolerance to the supine position, in 36%. The sensitivity and specificity of the stress test for clinically significant hypotension (symptomatic hypotension) for patients randomized to the crystalloid group (n=25) were 69 and 92% respectively. Patients with a positive stress test receiving a crystalloid preload showed a higher frequency of hypotension compared to all other groups, 90% vs. 33%, (P=0.003) and also a greater need for ephedrine, mean dose (SD): 20.0 (9.7) vs. 8.4 (9.0) mg (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with a positive preoperative supine stress test constitute a subset at increased risk for clinically significant hypotension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. These women seem more likely to benefit from prophylactic colloid solution than women with a negative stress test.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app