We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Studies
Assessments of interrater reliability and internal consistency of the Norwegian version of the Berg Balance Scale.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007 January
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interrater reliability and the internal consistency of the Norwegian version of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) when applied to patients in a geriatric department.
DESIGN: Interrater reliability was measured using the kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
SETTING: Geriatric rehabilitation unit and geriatric day hospital in Norway.
PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three patients were included; 25 were inpatients in a geriatric rehabilitation unit, whereas 58 were admitted to a geriatric day hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The BBS.
RESULTS: The kappa values for the different BBS items varied from 0.83 to 1.00, and the ICC for the sum score of the BBS was .998 (95% confidence interval, .996-.999). The mean value of the BBS was 44.4. There was a negative significant relation between age and the sum score (r=-.36). The sum scores of BBS ranged from 12 to 56. The patients were able to perform the BBS without ceiling effect. The score values 3 and 4 were more frequently used than the score values 0, 1, and 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the BBS seems to have an excellent interrater reliability and high internal consistency when applied to patients in geriatric rehabilitation.
DESIGN: Interrater reliability was measured using the kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
SETTING: Geriatric rehabilitation unit and geriatric day hospital in Norway.
PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three patients were included; 25 were inpatients in a geriatric rehabilitation unit, whereas 58 were admitted to a geriatric day hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The BBS.
RESULTS: The kappa values for the different BBS items varied from 0.83 to 1.00, and the ICC for the sum score of the BBS was .998 (95% confidence interval, .996-.999). The mean value of the BBS was 44.4. There was a negative significant relation between age and the sum score (r=-.36). The sum scores of BBS ranged from 12 to 56. The patients were able to perform the BBS without ceiling effect. The score values 3 and 4 were more frequently used than the score values 0, 1, and 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the BBS seems to have an excellent interrater reliability and high internal consistency when applied to patients in geriatric rehabilitation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app