We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement.
Anesthesia and Analgesia 2007 January
BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) guidance to confirm accurate positioning of central venous catheters (CVC), placed before surgery in the operating room, is rarely used in the United States. We designed this randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether the use of this technique impacts the accuracy of CVC placement.
METHODS: Patients in group ECG (n = 147) had a CVC placed using right-atrial ECG to guide catheter tip positioning. CVCs in group NO-ECG (n = 143) were positioned without this technique.
RESULTS: Overall, guidewire-ECG control resulted in more correctly positioned CVCs (96% vs 76%, P < or = 0.001) without increasing placement time. Significantly more CVCs were placed in the middle of the superior vena cava in group ECG (P < or = 0.001), although placement into the right atrium or right ventricle and into other vessels occurred significantly more often in group NO-ECG (P < or = 0.001). Twenty patients in group NO-ECG required repositioning of their CVC after surgery, whereas this maneuver was necessary only in three patients in group ECG (P < or = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ECG guidance allows for more accurate CVC placement, and should be considered to increase patient safety and reduce costs associated with repositioning procedures.
METHODS: Patients in group ECG (n = 147) had a CVC placed using right-atrial ECG to guide catheter tip positioning. CVCs in group NO-ECG (n = 143) were positioned without this technique.
RESULTS: Overall, guidewire-ECG control resulted in more correctly positioned CVCs (96% vs 76%, P < or = 0.001) without increasing placement time. Significantly more CVCs were placed in the middle of the superior vena cava in group ECG (P < or = 0.001), although placement into the right atrium or right ventricle and into other vessels occurred significantly more often in group NO-ECG (P < or = 0.001). Twenty patients in group NO-ECG required repositioning of their CVC after surgery, whereas this maneuver was necessary only in three patients in group ECG (P < or = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ECG guidance allows for more accurate CVC placement, and should be considered to increase patient safety and reduce costs associated with repositioning procedures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app