We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Medication therapy management survey of the prescription drug plans.
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA 2006 November
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preliminary development and implementation plans for medication therapy management (MTM) services across plan sponsors for the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs) and provide pharmacists with insights for MTM development.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: United States.
PARTICIPANTS: 307 individual contacts from Medicare Advantage or stand-alone PDPs.
INTERVENTION: A survey comprising questions about the PDP demographics, plans and implementation, beneficiary eligibility criteria, scope of services, providers of services, and payment structure for MTM services was e-mailed and mailed in November 2005.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and bivariate analysis of survey items.
RESULTS: A total of 97 usable surveys were completed, a 31.5% response rate. Almost all respondents had a plan in place for MTM services. The majority of PDPs perceived that MTM would have a moderate benefit to their organization. Most PDPs planned to focus efforts on diabetes, heart failure, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Overwhelmingly, PDPs planned to follow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate for criteria regarding beneficiary eligibility. Only 8.2% of respondents planned to use a "traditional" pharmacist, such as a community, long-term care, hospital, or clinic pharmacist. The majority of PDPs (53.6%) planned to employ managed care pharmacists to administer MTM services.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are eager to implement MTM services and are looking for PDPs to provide a path of implementation and reimbursement. Many PDPs were planning to deliver MTM services internally using health professional staff, thereby limiting the extent of participation of community, long-term care, hospital and health-system, and clinic-based pharmacists. Further research and advocacy are required to ensure that MTM services accomplish the true intent of the congressional and CMS mandates.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: United States.
PARTICIPANTS: 307 individual contacts from Medicare Advantage or stand-alone PDPs.
INTERVENTION: A survey comprising questions about the PDP demographics, plans and implementation, beneficiary eligibility criteria, scope of services, providers of services, and payment structure for MTM services was e-mailed and mailed in November 2005.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and bivariate analysis of survey items.
RESULTS: A total of 97 usable surveys were completed, a 31.5% response rate. Almost all respondents had a plan in place for MTM services. The majority of PDPs perceived that MTM would have a moderate benefit to their organization. Most PDPs planned to focus efforts on diabetes, heart failure, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Overwhelmingly, PDPs planned to follow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate for criteria regarding beneficiary eligibility. Only 8.2% of respondents planned to use a "traditional" pharmacist, such as a community, long-term care, hospital, or clinic pharmacist. The majority of PDPs (53.6%) planned to employ managed care pharmacists to administer MTM services.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are eager to implement MTM services and are looking for PDPs to provide a path of implementation and reimbursement. Many PDPs were planning to deliver MTM services internally using health professional staff, thereby limiting the extent of participation of community, long-term care, hospital and health-system, and clinic-based pharmacists. Further research and advocacy are required to ensure that MTM services accomplish the true intent of the congressional and CMS mandates.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app