COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Will suburothelial injection of small dose of botulinum A toxin have similar therapeutic effects and less adverse events for refractory detrusor overactivity?

Urology 2006 November
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether suburothelial injection of different doses of botulinum A toxin (BTX-A) will have a similar therapeutic effect but fewer adverse events than 200 U BTX-A in patients with refractory detrusor overactivity.

METHODS: A total of 75 patients with detrusor overactivity refractory to anticholinergics were enrolled and randomized to receive 100, 150, or 200 U of BTX-A injected into the suburothelial space at 40 sites. Urinary incontinence was graded on a self-reported scale of 0 to 3, representing continence and mild, moderate and severe incontinence, respectively. The therapeutic effects, adverse events, and urodynamic parameters were assessed at 3 months.

RESULTS: An excellent result at 3 months was obtained in 34.8%, 36%, and 40.7% of patients treated with 100, 150, and 200 U of BTX-A, respectively. The patients who received 100 U of BTX-A had a lower incidence of a large postvoid residual urine volume (150 mL or more) than did those who received 150 or 200 U (30.4% versus 52% and 72%, respectively, P = 0.011) after treatment. The posttreatment urodynamic parameters were similar between the patients who received 150 or 200 U of BTX-A, but the changes in bladder capacity and postvoid residual urine volume were greater than those for the patients who received 100 U. The duration of therapeutic effectiveness was significantly shorter for the patients treated with 100 U compared with that for those treated with 150 or 200 U of BTX-A.

CONCLUSIONS: Suburothelial injection of 100 U of BTX-A achieved a similar rate of excellent results and had significantly fewer adverse events compared with 150 or 200 U. The dose of suburothelial BTX-A also affected the duration of therapeutic effectiveness.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app