We have located links that may give you full text access.
Feasibility of preclinical cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance in HEMS in thoracic pain--the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor.
Air Medical Journal 2006 November
BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) are important hemodynamic parameters in emergency patients and for clinical early goal-directed therapy. This study evaluated the feasibility of CO and SVR determination using preclinical continuous wave Doppler ultrasound in a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) on emergency patients presenting with or without thoracic pain as a pilot observational study.
METHODS: Forty-four consecutive medical emergency patients (62.8 +/- 22 years of age, 23 males) were classified at the scene as with (15 patients, 69 +/- 14 years of age, 40% male) or without (29 patients, 60 +/- 25 years of age, 59% male) thoracic pain by an emergency physician. Hemodynamic parameters were determined based on continuous wave Doppler noninvasively (USCOM, Sydney, Australia): stroke volume (SV), CO, cardiac index (CI), minute distance (MD), and SVR.
RESULTS: Noninvasive SV, MD, CO, CI, and SVR determination is feasible using preclinical ultrasound in HEMS. Thoracic pain patients had higher SVR (2,709 +/- 891 vs 1,499 +/- 661 dyne*sec*cm-5) and lower CO/CI (3.37 +/- 1.1 vs 5.06 +/- 2.9 L/min, CI: 1.67 +/- 0.58 vs 3.18 +/- 1.34 L/min/m2) as well as a reduced aortic minute distance (11.2 +/- 3.3 m/min vs 19.1 +/- 8 m/min, P = .001) than patients without thoracic pain. Highest cardiac outputs were measured during and within 30 minutes after seizures (n = 5, 7.5 +/- 3.05 L/min). The range of CO measured in six cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients was 2.7 to 12 L/min; the level of CO was not associated with the establishing of sustained circulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Determining SV, CO/CI, and SVR in different emergency situations in HEMS using rapid CW Doppler ultrasound is feasible. Thoracic pain patients have increased SVR and lower CO/CI and reduced aortic minute distance than do non-thoracic pain patients in the preclinical setting.
METHODS: Forty-four consecutive medical emergency patients (62.8 +/- 22 years of age, 23 males) were classified at the scene as with (15 patients, 69 +/- 14 years of age, 40% male) or without (29 patients, 60 +/- 25 years of age, 59% male) thoracic pain by an emergency physician. Hemodynamic parameters were determined based on continuous wave Doppler noninvasively (USCOM, Sydney, Australia): stroke volume (SV), CO, cardiac index (CI), minute distance (MD), and SVR.
RESULTS: Noninvasive SV, MD, CO, CI, and SVR determination is feasible using preclinical ultrasound in HEMS. Thoracic pain patients had higher SVR (2,709 +/- 891 vs 1,499 +/- 661 dyne*sec*cm-5) and lower CO/CI (3.37 +/- 1.1 vs 5.06 +/- 2.9 L/min, CI: 1.67 +/- 0.58 vs 3.18 +/- 1.34 L/min/m2) as well as a reduced aortic minute distance (11.2 +/- 3.3 m/min vs 19.1 +/- 8 m/min, P = .001) than patients without thoracic pain. Highest cardiac outputs were measured during and within 30 minutes after seizures (n = 5, 7.5 +/- 3.05 L/min). The range of CO measured in six cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients was 2.7 to 12 L/min; the level of CO was not associated with the establishing of sustained circulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Determining SV, CO/CI, and SVR in different emergency situations in HEMS using rapid CW Doppler ultrasound is feasible. Thoracic pain patients have increased SVR and lower CO/CI and reduced aortic minute distance than do non-thoracic pain patients in the preclinical setting.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app