We have located links that may give you full text access.
Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: a minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2006 September
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension and describe the surgical technique.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: University tertiary medical center.
PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse and desire for uterine preservation who underwent surgical repair.
INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic uterine uterosacral uterine suspension.
MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the ICS pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Descriptive statistics and paired t testing were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Nineteen of 23 patients (82.6%) had preoperative prolapse stage 2 or greater. Nine patients (40.9%) had uterine prolapse beyond the hymen. After operation there were significant improvements in the stage of prolapse (2 vs 0, p<.01). The POP-Q scores for point C and D were significantly further away from the hymen after operation than compared with the preoperative values (-0.6 vs -7.8, and -5.0 vs -8.6; p<.01) respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The estimated blood loss (mean+/-SD) was 111.5+/-139.4 mL. The hospital stay (mean+/-SD) was 2.2+/-1.7 days. None of the patients had symptomatic prolapse during the mean follow-up of 15.9 months.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic uterine suspension appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for uterine prolapse in patients who desire uterine preservation.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: University tertiary medical center.
PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse and desire for uterine preservation who underwent surgical repair.
INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic uterine uterosacral uterine suspension.
MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the ICS pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Descriptive statistics and paired t testing were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Nineteen of 23 patients (82.6%) had preoperative prolapse stage 2 or greater. Nine patients (40.9%) had uterine prolapse beyond the hymen. After operation there were significant improvements in the stage of prolapse (2 vs 0, p<.01). The POP-Q scores for point C and D were significantly further away from the hymen after operation than compared with the preoperative values (-0.6 vs -7.8, and -5.0 vs -8.6; p<.01) respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The estimated blood loss (mean+/-SD) was 111.5+/-139.4 mL. The hospital stay (mean+/-SD) was 2.2+/-1.7 days. None of the patients had symptomatic prolapse during the mean follow-up of 15.9 months.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic uterine suspension appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for uterine prolapse in patients who desire uterine preservation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app