Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Transnasal endoscopic surgery of the pituitary: modifications and results over 10 years.

Laryngoscope 2006 September
OBJECTIVE: A 10-year retrospective review of three endoscopic approaches used by the authors for pituitary gland surgery is presented. We review our results and complications and outline the advantages and disadvantages of each. The variations in nasal anatomy that factor in the endoscopic approach are tabulated and discussed.

METHODS: A chart review and examination of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients who have had endoscopic pituitary surgery by the authors was performed. We gathered specific details of the operative approach, nasal-sinus anatomy, tumor location, required ancillary nasal procedures, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS: Ninety patients had endoscopic pituitary surgery. Operative reports and review of radiographic studies were possible for 75 patients. The surgical approach progressed over 10 years from endoscopic transseptal (42) to bilateral transostial (13) to unilateral transostial (20). Adequate exposure for the degree of resection was achieved in all patients. Complications included hemorrhage requiring return to the operating room (1), transient visual field loss (2), and transient diabetes insipidus (7). Four patients subsequently had craniotomy to resect suprasellar tumor extension. The average follow-up was 6 years. One patient required revision endoscopic resection 3 years later for tumor recurrence. Anatomic findings included nasal septal deflections in 36 (48%) of the patients, abnormalities of the turbinates in 42 (56%), and variances of the sphenoid sinus septum in 59 (79%) of the patients. In the unilateral transostial approach, the operative side was often determined by anatomic factors.

CONCLUSION: The authors have exclusively used endoscopic surgery of pituitary gland tumors for over 10 years. Modifications to the approach have occurred as a result of increased surgeon experience and improved technology. The unilateral transostial approach is safe, effective, and recommended.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app