Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis does not affect time to first infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Pediatrics 2006 September
OBJECTIVE: Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis was introduced in the Piedmont region of Italy in the year 2000. Our aim with this study was to estimate the effect of newborn screening on the risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection at the regional cystic fibrosis pediatric reference center.

METHODS: The time to first infection with P aeruginosa within the historical cohort of cystic fibrosis children diagnosed between January 1, 1997, and June 30, 2004, was investigated, comparing survival functions and the adjusted hazard ratio of children diagnosed before and after newborn screening introduction. The role of pancreatic insufficiency was also concurrently investigated.

RESULTS: Overall, 71 children diagnosed with cystic fibrosis were identified, 27 cases were clinically diagnosed before newborn screening introduction, and 5 of them presented with meconium ileus, whereas 44 were identified by newborn screening. Among them 35 needed pancreatic enzyme supplementation, whereas 34 children were infected with P aeruginosa. Both the nonparametric and semiparametric survival estimates failed to show any significant increase in the risk of P aeruginosa infection among screened children compared with historical controls. However, the median time from cystic fibrosis diagnosis to P aeruginosa infection among screened children was significantly shorter (183 vs 448 days). Children with impaired pancreatic function were at high risk of P aeruginosa infection.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that health authorities should regard newborn screening for cystic fibrosis as an opportunity to improve care and outcomes among affected children and shift the focus from whether it is appropriate to screen to how to optimize biomedical and psychosocial outcomes of screening.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app