We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Patients--a useful resource when evaluating medical students' clinical practice?].
BACKGROUND: Many medical students experience that they do not get satisfactory feedback during their general practice preceptorship. We wanted to explore whether an evaluation questionnaire answered by patients could be a useful tool for students and tutors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Department of General Practice and Community Medicine at the University of Oslo invited medical students who attended general practice preceptorship during spring 2005 to participate. The questionnaire consisted of eight questions regarding the consultation. Both tutors and students also considered the benefits of the evaluation form in a subsequent questionnaire. The answers to both of the questionnaires were analysed statistically. Some students were organised into focus groups that discussed the use of patient questionnaires before and after the preceptorship period.
RESULTS: 648 patients answered questionnaires following 36 students' independent consultations. The patient, the observing tutor and the student assessed 63 of these consultations. The patients scored eight issues with mean values from 4.3 to 5.0, with 5.0 being the best possible result. The questionnaires from the observed consultations showed that the tutors' assessment did not differ from the patients' on five out of seven compared issues. The tutors gave higher scores on the subject of the student's use of complicated language, and lower on the subject of physical examination. The students' self-assessment was significantly lower in six out of seven issues. The reactions to the questionnaire from both tutors and students were mixed. The students expressed that the use of questionnaires might contribute to better feedback from the preceptors or to obtain more independent consultations.
INTERPRETATION: The students' consultations received a very high score from both patients and tutors, while the students themselves scored their own achievements lower. The evaluation questionnaires may be useful tools to improve feedback to students on their consultations in the preceptorship period.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Department of General Practice and Community Medicine at the University of Oslo invited medical students who attended general practice preceptorship during spring 2005 to participate. The questionnaire consisted of eight questions regarding the consultation. Both tutors and students also considered the benefits of the evaluation form in a subsequent questionnaire. The answers to both of the questionnaires were analysed statistically. Some students were organised into focus groups that discussed the use of patient questionnaires before and after the preceptorship period.
RESULTS: 648 patients answered questionnaires following 36 students' independent consultations. The patient, the observing tutor and the student assessed 63 of these consultations. The patients scored eight issues with mean values from 4.3 to 5.0, with 5.0 being the best possible result. The questionnaires from the observed consultations showed that the tutors' assessment did not differ from the patients' on five out of seven compared issues. The tutors gave higher scores on the subject of the student's use of complicated language, and lower on the subject of physical examination. The students' self-assessment was significantly lower in six out of seven issues. The reactions to the questionnaire from both tutors and students were mixed. The students expressed that the use of questionnaires might contribute to better feedback from the preceptors or to obtain more independent consultations.
INTERPRETATION: The students' consultations received a very high score from both patients and tutors, while the students themselves scored their own achievements lower. The evaluation questionnaires may be useful tools to improve feedback to students on their consultations in the preceptorship period.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app