ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Guideline conformance for outpatient management of COPD in Germany].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are the ones mainly responsible for the initial diagnosis and outpatient care of patients with COPD. The aim of the present survey was to investigate their initial management of COPD in Germany based on current guidelines and to identify any deviations.

METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted as a multiple-choice questionnaire sent out to 1836 PCPs in seven Federal States of Germany (one large town and surrounding country in each). The product-neutral questions focused on the key aspects of current national and international (GLOBAL) COPD guidelines.

RESULTS: 486 physicians participated in the study (response rate 26.5%). 66.5% of the physicians used the German COPD guidelines, 20.8% used GOLD guidelines, and only 11.7% observed no guidelines. The physicians were aware of the epidemiological and public health significance of COPD. 76.5% saw spirometry as the diagnostic standard: it was available in 90.1% of the practices. However, only 60-65% were able to cite the correct spirometric criteria for classifying severity of the disease. Educational measures to help patients quit smoking and the teaching and monitoring of patients' inhalation technique were inadequately implemented. The two most important therapeutic goals cited were to improve quality of life (69.1%) and prevent exacerbations (53.1%). Except for the criteria for the use of steroids and the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation measures, treatment of COPD based on severity class was largely in compliance with the guidelines. However, a significant percentage of the physicians incorrectly assessed the evidence-based clinical benefits of various therapeutic measures.

CONCLUSION: The study shows that, despite the high regard in which COPD guidelines are held, deficiencies exist with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of COPD and the practical implementation of educational measures.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app