Your institution is subscribed to Read Institutional Edition. Log in or Sign Up to read full text articles.

COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of the dexamethasone-suppressed corticotropin-releasing hormone test and low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

N M Martin, W S Dhillo, A Banerjee, A Abdulali, C N Jayasena, M Donaldson, J F Todd, K Meeran
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006, 91 (7): 2582-6
16670165

CONTEXT: The low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) is widely used in confirming a diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. CRH administration at the end of an LDDST has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this test.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess whether CRH administration after a standard LDDST (LDDST-CRH test) improves diagnostic accuracy in Cushing's syndrome.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six individuals with a clinical suspicion of Cushing's syndrome each completed a standard LDDST and an LDDST-CRH test at Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London. The LDDST involved administration of 0.5 mg oral dexamethasone given 6-hourly for 48 h. Serum cortisol was measured 6 h after the last dose of dexamethasone, with a value of 50 nmol/liter or below excluding Cushing's syndrome. Immediately after this, the LDDST-CRH test commenced with administration of a ninth dose of 0.5 mg dexamethasone. Exactly 2 h later, 100 mug human-sequence CRH was administered. Serum cortisol was measured 15 min after the CRH injection, with a value of less than 38 nmol/liter also excluding Cushing's syndrome.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis or exclusion of Cushing's syndrome was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS: Twelve subjects were diagnosed with Cushing's syndrome (eight Cushing's disease and four primary adrenal). The sensitivity of the LDDST in diagnosing Cushing's syndrome was 100%, with a specificity of 88%. In contrast, although the sensitivity of the LDDST-CRH test was also 100%, specificity was reduced at 67%. These results give a positive predictive value of 80% for the LDDST and 60% for the LDDST-CRH test.

CONCLUSION: This small study suggests that the addition of CRH to the LDDST does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the standard LDDST in Cushing's syndrome.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
16670165
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.