COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus

Yavuz Kocabey, Haw Chong Chang, Jeff C Brand, Akbar Nawab, John Nyland, David N M Caborn
Arthroscopy 2006, 22 (4): 406-13
16581453

PURPOSE: This biomechanical study compared the fixation characteristics of horizontally or vertically implanted FasT-Fix devices (Smith & Nephew, Endoscopy Division, Andover, MA) consisting of two 5-mm PLLA suture T-bar anchors with a pretied self-sliding knot (No. 0 nonabsorbable, USP, braided polyester suture material) and the RapidLoc device (Mitek Surgical Products, Westwood, MA) consisting of a PLLA T-bar anchor or "backstop," a connecting suture (No. 2 nonbiodegradable Ethibond; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), and a PLLA grommet, for repairing posterior third lesions in human menisci.

TYPE OF STUDY: Controlled laboratory biomechanical study.

METHODS: After repair of a vertical longitudinal meniscus lesion with either vertically or horizontally implanted FasT-Fix devices or RapidLoc devices, 3 groups of 6 specimens underwent cyclic loading (5 mm/minute, cycling between 5 and 50 N at 1 Hz for 500 cycles) before load to failure testing on a servo hydraulic device. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD post hoc tests were used to evaluate group differences (P < .05).

RESULTS: The vertical FasT-Fix device group (3.2 +/- 0.49 mm) had less displacement after cyclic testing than either the horizontal FasT-Fix (4.4 +/- 0.73 mm, P = .003) or the RapidLoc (4.6 +/- 0.22 mm, P = .002) device groups. The vertical FasT-Fix device group had greater stiffness during cyclic testing (14.4 +/- 2.1 N/mm) than the horizontal FasT-Fix (10.4 +/- 1.6 N/mm, P = .0001) or the RapidLoc (9.7 +/- 0.44 N/mm, P = .0001) device groups. During load to failure testing, the vertical FasT-Fix group (125.3 +/- 39 N) had 28% greater strength than the horizontal FasT-Fix device group (89.7 +/- 14 N, P = .02) and 30% greater strength than the RapidLoc device group (87.1 +/- 13 N, P = .028), whereas displacement and stiffness did not show statistically significant group differences.

CONCLUSIONS: The vertical FasT-Fix group had superior biomechanical characteristics for meniscal fixation during cyclic and load to failure testing compared with horizontal FasT-Fix or RapidLoc devices.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the RapidLoc devices provided fixation characteristics comparable to horizontally implanted FasT-Fix devices, vertically implanted FasT-Fix devices may provide superior all-inside fixation.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
16581453
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"