We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Factors affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Journal of Surgical Oncology 2006 April 2
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is common, the safety and indication has not yet been established.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared the mortality and morbidity of 24 patients who underwent salvage surgery with those of historical controls treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by planned esophagectomy during the same period, and analyzed the prognostic factor of salvage surgery.
RESULTS: Preoperative serum albumin (3.7 vs. 4.1 g/dl, P = 0.0157) and lymphocyte count (763 vs. 964/mm(3), P = 0.0111) in the salvage group were significantly lower than those in the neoadjuvant group. A significant difference was also observed in operation time (567 vs. 474 min, P = 0.0381), C-reactive protein (CRP) on postoperative day 1 (11.2 vs. 8.7 mg/dl, P = 0.0021), and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) duration (3.5 vs. 2.9 days, P = 0.0486). There were three hospital deaths in the salvage group, whereas no patient died in the neoadjuvant group. Multivariate analysis showed curability (R0 vs. R1 + R2) to be the strongest prognostic factor of salvage surgery (P = 0.0064). R1 + R2 operation was more frequently performed in the salvage group (33% vs. 13%), and the reason for all cases was unresectable T4, which had been underestimated preoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage surgery is a highly invasive and morbid operation, which is performed on immunocompromised hosts. The indication must be carefully considered, with care taken to avoid non-curative surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared the mortality and morbidity of 24 patients who underwent salvage surgery with those of historical controls treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by planned esophagectomy during the same period, and analyzed the prognostic factor of salvage surgery.
RESULTS: Preoperative serum albumin (3.7 vs. 4.1 g/dl, P = 0.0157) and lymphocyte count (763 vs. 964/mm(3), P = 0.0111) in the salvage group were significantly lower than those in the neoadjuvant group. A significant difference was also observed in operation time (567 vs. 474 min, P = 0.0381), C-reactive protein (CRP) on postoperative day 1 (11.2 vs. 8.7 mg/dl, P = 0.0021), and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) duration (3.5 vs. 2.9 days, P = 0.0486). There were three hospital deaths in the salvage group, whereas no patient died in the neoadjuvant group. Multivariate analysis showed curability (R0 vs. R1 + R2) to be the strongest prognostic factor of salvage surgery (P = 0.0064). R1 + R2 operation was more frequently performed in the salvage group (33% vs. 13%), and the reason for all cases was unresectable T4, which had been underestimated preoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage surgery is a highly invasive and morbid operation, which is performed on immunocompromised hosts. The indication must be carefully considered, with care taken to avoid non-curative surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app