We have located links that may give you full text access.
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
VALIDATION STUDIES
Evaluation of a frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment in a population based study of elderly Canadians.
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2005 December
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Objectives were to develop a frailty index (FI) based on a standard comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) derived from a clinical examination; to assess the validity of the FI-CGA and to compare its precision with other frailty measures.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, with five-year follow-up data.
SETTING: Second phase of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA-2); clinical examinations were performed in clinics, nursing homes, and patients' homes.
PARTICIPANTS: People selected (as either cognitively impaired cases or unimpaired controls) to receive the CSHA-2 clinical examination (n = 2305; women = 1431).
MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and performance-based measures and diagnostic data were extracted to correspond to the 10 impairment domains and the single comorbidity domain of a CGA. The proportion of deficits accumulated in each domain was calculated to yield the FI-CGA. The FI-CGA was validated and its predictive ability compared with other frailty measures.
RESULTS: Within the seven grades of fitness/frailty identified, subjects with greater frailty were older, less educated, and more likely to be women. The FI-CGA correlated highly with a previously validated, empirically-derived frailty index (r = 0.76). Frailty was associated with higher risk of death (for each increment in frailty, the hazard ratio, adjusted for age, sex and education, was 1.23 (95% CI 1.18-1.29) and institutionalization (HR 1.20; 1.10-1.32).
CONCLUSIONS: In a population survey, the FI-CGA is a valid means of quantifying frailty from routinely collected data.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, with five-year follow-up data.
SETTING: Second phase of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA-2); clinical examinations were performed in clinics, nursing homes, and patients' homes.
PARTICIPANTS: People selected (as either cognitively impaired cases or unimpaired controls) to receive the CSHA-2 clinical examination (n = 2305; women = 1431).
MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and performance-based measures and diagnostic data were extracted to correspond to the 10 impairment domains and the single comorbidity domain of a CGA. The proportion of deficits accumulated in each domain was calculated to yield the FI-CGA. The FI-CGA was validated and its predictive ability compared with other frailty measures.
RESULTS: Within the seven grades of fitness/frailty identified, subjects with greater frailty were older, less educated, and more likely to be women. The FI-CGA correlated highly with a previously validated, empirically-derived frailty index (r = 0.76). Frailty was associated with higher risk of death (for each increment in frailty, the hazard ratio, adjusted for age, sex and education, was 1.23 (95% CI 1.18-1.29) and institutionalization (HR 1.20; 1.10-1.32).
CONCLUSIONS: In a population survey, the FI-CGA is a valid means of quantifying frailty from routinely collected data.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app