The diagnostic value of imaging techniques for aortic dissection

S D Barbant, M J Eisenberg, N B Schiller
American Heart Journal 1992, 124 (2): 541-3
Previous studies conducted in high-risk populations have reported high predictive values and accuracies for diagnostic imaging techniques for aortic dissection. To see how these techniques perform in low-risk populations, we used Bayes' theorem to calculate predictive values and accuracies for angiography, CT, MRI, and TEE. In high-risk populations (disease prevalence = 50%), positive predictive values were all greater than 85%. In intermediate risk populations (disease prevalence = 10%), positive predictive values were greater than or equal to 90% for CT, MRI, and TEE, but were 65% for angiography. In low-risk populations (disease prevalence = 1%), positive predictive values were 100% for MRI and less than or equal to 50% for angiography, CT, and TEE. In all three populations, negative predictive values and accuracies were greater than or equal to 85%. From these results we conclude that diagnostic imaging techniques for aortic dissection do not perform as well in low-risk populations as they do in high-risk populations.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article


You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.


Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"