COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using bacterial recombinant proteins of human BP230 as a diagnostic tool for bullous pemphigoid.

BACKGROUND: By immunoblot analyses of normal human epidermal extracts, the 230kDa bullous pemphigoid antigen (BP230) is recognized by most bullous pemphigoid (BP) sera. We produced different recombinant glutathione-S-transferase-fusion proteins, which roughly presented N-terminal domain, central rod domain and C-terminal domain of human BP230.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the recombinant proteins for detection of anti-BP230 IgG antibodies and assessed the usefulness of this assay in conjunction with an anti-BP180 ELISA to establish the diagnosis of BP.

METHODS: Using the bacterial recombinant proteins of N-terminal and C-terminal domains, we developed an ELISA. A receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine a cut-off value for the BP230 ELISA.

RESULTS: By this BP230 ELISA, 173 (72.4%) of 239 BP sera were positive, while only one (1.1%) of 94 sera from pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus patients was positive and all the 109 normal control sera were negative. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the BP230 ELISA were 72.4 and 99.5%, respectively. Interestingly, while 54 (84.4%) of 64 BP sera in active stage and 113 (64.6%) of 175 BP sera in remission were positive in BP180 ELISA, 37 (57.8%) of 64 BP sera in active stage and 136 (77.7%) of 175 BP sera in remission were positive in BP230 ELISA. These results indicate that the titer of anti-BP230 antibodies is not related with disease activity in some BP cases. Most significantly, by combining the results of BP230 ELISA and BP180 ELISA, 232 (97.1%) of 239 BP sera were positive.

CONCLUSION: The combination of BP230 ELISA and BP180 ELISA is the highly sensitive method for the diagnosis of BP.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app