JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of coma patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Chinese Medical Journal 2005 November 6
BACKGROUND: Coma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is commonly seen in daily clinical practice. How to objectively evaluate brain function after CPR is essential to the following treatment. Coma patients after CPR had been studied prospectively at the Neuro-Intensive Care Unit of Xuanwu Hospital since 2002. In this study, we focused on the topic of how to evaluate the severity of coma after CPR.

METHODS: From April 2002 to November 2004, patients in coma 24 hours after CPR were monitored, the evaluation methods included Glasgow coma score (GCS), brain stem reflection, and spinal reflection. Laboratory evaluation included electroencephalography (EEG), brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP), short latency somatosensory evoked potential (SLSEP), and transcranial Doppler (TCD).

RESULTS: Twenty-four of 35 patients (68.57%) were in deep coma. The GCS was 3 except for 2 patients; EEG was evaluated not less than grade IV except for 4 patients, BAEP was evaluated as grade III except for 3 patients, and SLSEP was evaluated as grade III except for 1 patient. Twenty-four patients died within 1 month and 11 of them (45.83%) were determined as brain death. Glasgow outcome score (GOS) was evaluated as grade I. Eleven of the 35 patients survived and their consciousness changed from deep coma to coma vigil. EEG was evaluated as gradeIin 5 patients, BAEP and SLSEP were evaluated as grade I in 3 patients, and GOS was all evaluated as grade II among the 11 patients. Two patients (18.18%) regained consciousness in 35 and 90 days after cardiopulmonary resuscitation and GOS was evaluated as grade IV and III, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Combined or continuous evaluation of clinical examinations and laboratory tests can accurately and objectively determine brain function after CPR.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app