We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
[Clinical study on the stability of palatal implant anchorage].
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue za Zhi = Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi = Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2005 November
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical stability of the palatal implant anchorage system in orthodontic treatment.
METHODS: Sixteen osseointegrated implants (5.0 mm in diameter, 6 mm length) were inserted in the median palatal suture area of 19 patients with malocclusion (average age: 18.22 +/- 7.10 years, from 11 years to 35 years 1 month) as anchorage of active orthodontic treatment with MBT appliance. The standard lateral cephalogram after implant placement and before implant removing was taken to compare the radiological parameters.
RESULTS: The successful rate of palatal implant anchorage was 84.2%. The average duration of 16 palatal implant was 23.08 +/- 8.06 months (from 10 months to 36 months). There were no statistical differences in all parameters from the implant placement to the end of treatment. IL-X was from (62.88 +/- 5.85) mm to (62.45 +/- 6.70) mm, IL-Y was from (36.66 +/- 5.41) mm to (37.96 +/- 4.90) mm, IAP-PP was from (73.81 +/- 8.84) degrees to (74.72 +/- 9.22) degrees, IAP-Y was from (62.09 +/- 9.33) degrees to (63.85 +/- 10.96) degrees, U6-Y is from (20.80 +/- 5.87) mm to (21.49 +/- 6.00) mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Stable palatal implant anchorage was maintained during active orthodontic treatment.
METHODS: Sixteen osseointegrated implants (5.0 mm in diameter, 6 mm length) were inserted in the median palatal suture area of 19 patients with malocclusion (average age: 18.22 +/- 7.10 years, from 11 years to 35 years 1 month) as anchorage of active orthodontic treatment with MBT appliance. The standard lateral cephalogram after implant placement and before implant removing was taken to compare the radiological parameters.
RESULTS: The successful rate of palatal implant anchorage was 84.2%. The average duration of 16 palatal implant was 23.08 +/- 8.06 months (from 10 months to 36 months). There were no statistical differences in all parameters from the implant placement to the end of treatment. IL-X was from (62.88 +/- 5.85) mm to (62.45 +/- 6.70) mm, IL-Y was from (36.66 +/- 5.41) mm to (37.96 +/- 4.90) mm, IAP-PP was from (73.81 +/- 8.84) degrees to (74.72 +/- 9.22) degrees, IAP-Y was from (62.09 +/- 9.33) degrees to (63.85 +/- 10.96) degrees, U6-Y is from (20.80 +/- 5.87) mm to (21.49 +/- 6.00) mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Stable palatal implant anchorage was maintained during active orthodontic treatment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app