COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[16-row multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremity arteries: contrast enhancement and image quality using a standarized examination protocol].

PURPOSE: To assess the degree of enhancement and image quality of 16-slice multidetector CT angiography (MDCTA) of pelvic and lower limb arteries with a monophasic contrast medium injection protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent a CT angiography of the pelvic and lower limb arteries using the following parameters: collimation 16 x 1.5 mm, rotation time 0.5 s, table feed 40 mm/sec, slice thickness 2 mm, reconstruction interval 1.2 mm, 100 ml Iomeprol 400 + 60 ml normal saline, flow rate 4 ml/s, bolus tracking (threshold of 250 DeltaHU in aorta). Arterial enhancement was measured in all arterial segments. Maximum intensity projections (MIP) together with axial images were reviewed by two radiologists (consensus). If the results were inconclusive for stenosis, additional curved multiplanar reformations (MPR) were performed.

RESULTS: The mean arterial enhancement values were aorta: 314 +/- 69, pelvis: 342 +/- 105, thigh: 347 +/- 139, calf: 231 +/- 109 DeltaHU. The image quality was judged as excellent in 346 (77.6 %), adequate in 76 (17 %), and inadequate in 24 (5.4 %, all but one in calf and foot) of 446 arterial territories. An override of the contrast bolus below the knee occurred in 2 patients rendering the calf arteries nondiagnostic. Venous enhancement occurred in 13 patients but this compromised the diagnostic assessment in only one case. Additional MPRs were required accurately to assess stenoses in 22 of 200 arterial levels in 16 patients with marked arterial calcifications.

CONCLUSION: 16-slice MDCTA with a monophasic contrast bolus of Iomeprol 400 provided good arterial enhancement and diagnostic image quality in 94.6 % of the depicted arterial segments. The majority (67 %) of nondiagnostic segments were below the ankle. MPRs were required in patients with marked calcification for accurate assessment of stenosis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app