COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessment and evaluation of the nutritional status of the elderly using 2 different instruments

Ozge Kucukerdonmez, Eda Koksal, Neslisah Rakicioglu, Gulden Pekcan
Saudi Medical Journal 2005, 26 (10): 1611-6
16228066

OBJECTIVES: The elderly population continues to increase in most countries and inadequate nutrition is a common problem affecting their functional and physical status. Therefore, we should periodically assess the nutritional status of the elderly using practical methods. Our study objectives are to assess the nutritional status of the elderly using 2 different methods: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Nutritional Screening Initiative Checklist (NSIC), and to evaluate the consistency of the methods.

METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study between February 2003 and March 2004. We included a total of 1,564 elderly volunteers living in Ankara, Turkey, with median (+/- inter quartile range [IQR]) age of 70 +/- 8 (Male: 71 +/- 9; Female: 70 +/- 9 ) years. We utilized 2 frequently used instruments; MNA and NSIC in this study.

RESULTS: The MNA results (<17 points) indicated that 6.5% of the male and 8.8% of the female participants had inadequate nutrition. According to NSIC, 34.3% of males and 36.9% of females were classified as having a high risk of nutritional deficiency. We observed a decrease in MNA and an increase in NSIC scores with the increase of age (p<0.01). We determined a negative correlation of MNA and positive correlation of NSIC with body weight, body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and calf circumference (CC) (p<0.01). We did not find correlations between MNA and NSIC score to be statistically significant (r:-0.318; p>0.05). We analyzed agreements between MNA and NSIC score by Kappa statistical method (kappa: 0.13, p: 0.285) and determined that neither of these 2 methods can be used in lieu of the other.

CONCLUSION: For the assessment of the nutritional status of the elderly, we could use both MNA and NSIC instruments but depending on the facilities and preferences, we cannot use one to replace the other. The MNA includes both anthropometric measurements and various nutritional parameters, and is a practical and most valid method.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
16228066
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"