Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: analysis of rejection.

UNLABELLED: The 3-year data concerning the occurrence of rejection episodes (RE) are reported herein.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred five simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations were performed from May 1998 to September 2000, including 103 patients randomly assigned to tacrolimus (Tac) and 102 to cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME). All patients received concomitant rATG induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term corticosteroids.

RESULTS: After a follow-up of 3 years, acute rejection episodes occurred in 41 patients receiving tacrolimus and in 51 patients receiving CsA ME. The majority of first rejection episodes in both groups occurred during the first 6 months (93% and 90%, respectively) and in most cases were treated with corticosteroids (88% and 90%). Actuarial rejection-free graft survival was not significantly different between the two groups (54% and 44% at 3 years posttransplant). In a multivariate analysis, HLA compatibility (P = .003) and graft vessel extension (P = .0005) had a significant influence on rejection-free survival. Rejection influenced pancreatic graft survival (P = .01) and pancreatic graft loss owing to rejection influenced patient survival (P = .02). In the intent-to-treat analysis of early rejection, first moderate-to-severe episodes (1 of 40 versus 12 of 47; P = .004) and refractory episodes (2 of 40 versus 10 of 47; P = .03) were significantly lower with tacrolimus than with CsA ME. Pancreatic graft survival was worse among late rejectors (53%) than nonrejectors (86%; P = .002). In addition, serum creatinine was highest in late rejectors. In conclusion, Tac-based immunosuppressive therapy shows advantages over CsA ME in terms of the severity of acute rejection episodes among patients undergoing SPK transplantation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app