We have located links that may give you full text access.
Latent arterial hypertension in apparently lone atrial fibrillation.
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology : An International Journal of Arrhythmias and Pacing 2005 September
INTRODUCTION: Longitudinal studies on lone AF are rare and the incidence of hypertension in this population unknown. This study aimed at investigating the incidence of arterial hypertension in patients with apparently lone atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of 292 consecutive patients presented with permanent or paroxysmal AF, 32 patients were diagnosed as having lone AF according to strict criteria. Three patients were subjected to ablation of the ligament of Marshall, 14 patients to pulmonary vein isolation, and the remainder were treated with beta blockade. Patients were followed-up for a 1-3 year period. During follow-up, 14 patients were diagnosed as having arterial hypertension. Thirteen of them had recurrent AF despite ligament of Marshall ablation (1 patient), pulmonary vein isolation (4 patients) and beta blockade (8 patients). Cox regression analysis revealed that the only significant predictor of development of hypertension was complete or partial response to antiarrhythmic therapy (beta=3.82, S.E.=1.22, exp(b)=45.63, 95% C.I.=4.17-499.2, p=0.001), independent of age (beta=-0.01, p=0.74), sex (beta=-0.91, p=0.28), left ventricular ejection fraction (beta=0.06, p=0.52), left atrial size (beta=0.58, p=0.7) and kind of antiarrhythmic therapy (ablation or drug therapy) (beta=1.36, p=0.09). In patients with lone AF that did not respond at all to antiarrhythmic therapy, there was a 45.6 times higher risk of diagnosing hypertension during the next 3 years as compared to responders.
CONCLUSION: Approximately 44% of patients with an initial diagnosis of lone AF may represent occult cases of arterial hypertension. In these patients hypertension may affect AF recurrence and treatment outcomes, regardless of the mode of antiarrhythmic therapy used.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of 292 consecutive patients presented with permanent or paroxysmal AF, 32 patients were diagnosed as having lone AF according to strict criteria. Three patients were subjected to ablation of the ligament of Marshall, 14 patients to pulmonary vein isolation, and the remainder were treated with beta blockade. Patients were followed-up for a 1-3 year period. During follow-up, 14 patients were diagnosed as having arterial hypertension. Thirteen of them had recurrent AF despite ligament of Marshall ablation (1 patient), pulmonary vein isolation (4 patients) and beta blockade (8 patients). Cox regression analysis revealed that the only significant predictor of development of hypertension was complete or partial response to antiarrhythmic therapy (beta=3.82, S.E.=1.22, exp(b)=45.63, 95% C.I.=4.17-499.2, p=0.001), independent of age (beta=-0.01, p=0.74), sex (beta=-0.91, p=0.28), left ventricular ejection fraction (beta=0.06, p=0.52), left atrial size (beta=0.58, p=0.7) and kind of antiarrhythmic therapy (ablation or drug therapy) (beta=1.36, p=0.09). In patients with lone AF that did not respond at all to antiarrhythmic therapy, there was a 45.6 times higher risk of diagnosing hypertension during the next 3 years as compared to responders.
CONCLUSION: Approximately 44% of patients with an initial diagnosis of lone AF may represent occult cases of arterial hypertension. In these patients hypertension may affect AF recurrence and treatment outcomes, regardless of the mode of antiarrhythmic therapy used.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app