We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Four-dimensional fetal echocardiography with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC): a systematic study of standard cardiac views assessed by different observers.
OBJECTIVE: To test the agreement between observers and reproducibility of a technique to display standard cardiac views of the left and right ventricular outflow tracts from four-dimensional volume datasets acquired with Spatiotemporal Image Correlation (STIC).
METHODS: A technique was developed to obtain dynamic multiplanar images of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) from volume datasets acquired with STIC. Volume datasets were acquired from fetuses with normal cardiac anatomy. Twenty volume datasets of satisfactory quality were pre-selected by one investigator. The data was randomly assigned for a blinded review by two independent observers with previous experience in fetal echocardiography. Only one volume dataset was used for each fetus. After a training session, the observers obtained standardized cardiac views of the LVOT and RVOT, which were scored on a scale of 1 to 5, based on diagnostic value and image quality (1=unacceptable, 2=marginal, 3=acceptable, 4=good, and 5=excellent). Median scores and interquartile range, as well as inter- and intraobserver agreement were calculated for each view.
RESULTS: The mean menstrual age at the time of volume acquisition was 25.5+/-4.5 weeks. Median scores (interquartile range) for LVOT images, obtained by the first and second observers, were 3.5 (2.25-5.00) and 4 (3.00-5.00), respectively. The median scores (interquartile range) for RVOT images obtained by the first and second observers were 3 (3.00-5.00) and 3 (2.00-4.00), respectively. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient for the LVOT was 0.693 (95% CI 0.380-0.822), and 0.696 (95% CI 0.382-0.866) for the RVOT. For the intraobserver agreement analysis, observer 1 gave higher scores to the LVOT the second time the volumes were analyzed [LVOT: 3.50 (2.25-5.00) vs. 5.00 (4.00-5.00, p=0.008)].
CONCLUSION: STIC can be reproducibly used to evaluate fetal cardiac outflow tracts by independent examiners. Slightly better image quality rating scores during the intraobserver variability trial suggests the presence of a learning curve for the manipulation and analysis of volume data obtained by STIC.
METHODS: A technique was developed to obtain dynamic multiplanar images of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) from volume datasets acquired with STIC. Volume datasets were acquired from fetuses with normal cardiac anatomy. Twenty volume datasets of satisfactory quality were pre-selected by one investigator. The data was randomly assigned for a blinded review by two independent observers with previous experience in fetal echocardiography. Only one volume dataset was used for each fetus. After a training session, the observers obtained standardized cardiac views of the LVOT and RVOT, which were scored on a scale of 1 to 5, based on diagnostic value and image quality (1=unacceptable, 2=marginal, 3=acceptable, 4=good, and 5=excellent). Median scores and interquartile range, as well as inter- and intraobserver agreement were calculated for each view.
RESULTS: The mean menstrual age at the time of volume acquisition was 25.5+/-4.5 weeks. Median scores (interquartile range) for LVOT images, obtained by the first and second observers, were 3.5 (2.25-5.00) and 4 (3.00-5.00), respectively. The median scores (interquartile range) for RVOT images obtained by the first and second observers were 3 (3.00-5.00) and 3 (2.00-4.00), respectively. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient for the LVOT was 0.693 (95% CI 0.380-0.822), and 0.696 (95% CI 0.382-0.866) for the RVOT. For the intraobserver agreement analysis, observer 1 gave higher scores to the LVOT the second time the volumes were analyzed [LVOT: 3.50 (2.25-5.00) vs. 5.00 (4.00-5.00, p=0.008)].
CONCLUSION: STIC can be reproducibly used to evaluate fetal cardiac outflow tracts by independent examiners. Slightly better image quality rating scores during the intraobserver variability trial suggests the presence of a learning curve for the manipulation and analysis of volume data obtained by STIC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app