COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws

Brian P Beaubien, Alihan Derincek, William D Lew, Kirkham B Wood
Spine 2005 August 15, 30 (16): 1846-51
16103854

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anteriorly placed lumbar plates, pedicle screws, and translaminar screws in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) setting.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an anteriorly placed lumbar plate reduces the flexibility in terms of neutral zone and range of motion of a simulated ALIF, and to compare this reduction in flexibility to that provided by posteriorly placed pedicle screws and translaminar screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicular and translaminar facet fixation add stability and increase fusion rates, compared with ALIF alone. An anteriorly placed lumbar plate has been introduced to provide stability without the need for a secondary approach. However, this plate has not been evaluated biomechanically.

METHODS: Seven intact, cadaveric lumbar motion segments were tested to +/- 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. Specimens were retested after ALIF, and after subsequent instrumentation with pedicle screws, translaminar screws, and anterior lumbar plates. The range of motion and neutral zone were measured from resulting flexibility curves.

RESULTS: Mean (+/- standard deviation) flexion-extension range of motion for intact segments (9.9 degrees +/- 3.1 degrees ) was significantly reduced to 7.7 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees after ALIF (P = 0.02), and was further reduced to 3.0 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees with lumbar plates (P < 0.001), 1.5 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees with pedicle screws (P < 0.001), and 0.9 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees with translaminar screws (P < 0.001). All 3 devices also reduced flexion-extension neutral zone and torsion neutral zone and range of motion, compared with ALIF alone (P < 0.05). Lumbar plates did not decrease lateral bending range of motion or neutral zone (P > 0.05), whereas pedicle and translaminar screws did (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Although not as rigid as pedicle or translaminar screws, anterior lumbar plating does add significant stability to an ALIF and may provide a valuable, single-approach alternative to supplemental posterior fixation.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
16103854
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"