COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Malleus-to-footplate versus malleus-to-stapes-head ossicular reconstruction prostheses: temporal bone pressure gain measurements and clinical audiological data

Euan Murugasu, Sunil Puria, Joseph B Roberson
Otology & Neurotology 2005, 26 (4): 572-82
16015149

HYPOTHESIS: Several clinical reports suggest that if the stapes superstructure is intact, ossicular reconstruction should be made to the stapes head rather than the footplate to achieve a better hearing outcome. To test this hypothesis, we compared the in situ mechanical performance of hydroxylapatite (HA) malleus-to-stapes-head (MSH) ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (ORP) with malleus-to-footplate (MFP) ORP, both manufactured by Project HEAR.

BACKGROUND: ORPs are commonly used to replace a missing or deficient incus. However, hearing outcomes are highly variable, depending on the ORP material, design, surgical technique, and ORP positioning.

METHODS: Cochleo-vestibular pressure measurements in human cadaveric temporal bones for the HA MFP ORP have been reported by Puria et al. (2005). In the present study, the ear canal pressure Pe and cochleovestibular pressure Pv were measured in cadaveric temporal bones with intact incus, removed incus, and MSH ORP reconstruction. The relative loss in gain, Lmsh, is defined as the ratio of Pv with reconstructed MSH ORP to intact incus and compared with Lmfp. A retrospective clinical audit of the pre- and postoperative audiologic results of patients who had undergone ossiculoplasty with either MSH or MFP ORP was conducted for comparison.

RESULTS: For the 0.5 to 3 kHz frequency range, Lmsh magnitude is 6.2 dB lower than the Lmfp magnitude (p = 0.05). The retrospective audit of audiologic results after ossiculoplasty with either MSH or MFP ORP revealed a similar difference in gain between the two ORP designs with air-bone gap differences of 7.6 dB (p = 0.04) and air conduction threshold differences of 8.0 dB (p = 0.13) for these patients.

CONCLUSION: The MFP ORP showed better average pressure gain compared with the MSH ORP across the speech frequencies. Surgeons performing ossiculoplasty with designs similar to Project HEAR HA ORPs, where there is direct columella-like connection between the malleus and stapes, should consider using the MFP ORP design to achieve a better postoperative audiologic result, even when the stapes superstructure is intact.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
16015149
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.