We have located links that may give you full text access.
ADDRESSES
COMPARATIVE STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, N.I.H., EXTRAMURAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Marked variation in response of consensus binding elements for the Rta protein of Epstein-Barr virus.
Journal of Virology 2005 August
The R transactivator (Rta) protein activates Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic-cycle genes by several distinct mechanisms that include direct binding to viral promoters, synergy with BamHI Z EBV replication activator (ZEBRA), and activation of cellular signaling pathways. In the direct and synergistic mechanisms of action, Rta binds to specific DNA sequences that are present in the promoters of responsive genes. It has been difficult to demonstrate the capacity of Rta expressed in mammalian cells to bind DNA in vitro in order to study the relative affinities of Rta binding elements. We discovered that a short C-terminal region of Rta inhibits the ability of Rta to bind DNA in vitro. C-terminally truncated versions of Rta bind DNA efficiently and thus facilitate a comparison of consensus Rta binding elements (CRBEs) found in promoters of five Rta-responsive genes: BMLF1, BHLF1, BMRF1, BaRF1, and BLRF2. All CRBEs in the promoters of the five genes conform to the proposed recognition sequence GNCCN9GGNG, where N is any nucleotide and N9 represents a sequence of nine nucleotides. Nonetheless, CRBEs varied markedly in their abilities to bind Rta in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Not all CRBEs bound or responded to Rta. Binding affinities of the CRBEs and the capacity to be activated by Rta in reporter assays were strongly correlated. The CRBEs from the BMLF1 and BHLF1 promoters conferred the greatest response. The response of the BMRF1, BaRF1, and BLRF2 CRBEs was less robust. By creation of chimeras, inversions, and point mutations, differences in binding affinities and transcriptional activation levels could be attributed to N9 sequence variation. The length of N9 was also critical for a maximal response. In Raji and BZLF1-knockout cells, the mRNAs of the five Rta-responsive lytic-cycle genes differed dramatically in kinetics of expression, abundance, and synergistic responses to ZEBRA and Rta. Affinities of Rta response elements for Rta are likely to play an important role in temporal regulation and the level of lytic-cycle EBV gene expression.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app