We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
A comparison of blood glucose meters in Australia.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2006 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy and precision of the five currently available blood glucose meters in Australia.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Control solutions from manufacturers were used to determine the precision for each meter. Glucose levels in capillary blood samples from 49 patients attending a diabetes clinic were measured with each meter and with a laboratory reference method.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The coefficient of variation was calculated to determine precision. Bias, Error Grid analysis, and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine accuracy.
RESULTS: The CVs of most meters were acceptable at <5%. Bias ranged from 4.0 to 15.5% with only 1 meter satisfying the American Diabetes Association recommendation of <5% bias. Error Grid analysis showed that 94-100% of readings were clinically accurate, and that none of the differences from the reference method would lead to clinical errors. Bland-Altman plots showed that for two meters the magnitude of the difference between the meter and the reference method increased with increasing glucose values, but did not change significantly with glucose level for the other 3 meters.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available blood glucose meters show acceptable precision, and any errors (with respect to a laboratory method) are highly unlikely to lead to clinical errors. However, only the CareSens meter achieved a bias of less than 5%.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Control solutions from manufacturers were used to determine the precision for each meter. Glucose levels in capillary blood samples from 49 patients attending a diabetes clinic were measured with each meter and with a laboratory reference method.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The coefficient of variation was calculated to determine precision. Bias, Error Grid analysis, and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine accuracy.
RESULTS: The CVs of most meters were acceptable at <5%. Bias ranged from 4.0 to 15.5% with only 1 meter satisfying the American Diabetes Association recommendation of <5% bias. Error Grid analysis showed that 94-100% of readings were clinically accurate, and that none of the differences from the reference method would lead to clinical errors. Bland-Altman plots showed that for two meters the magnitude of the difference between the meter and the reference method increased with increasing glucose values, but did not change significantly with glucose level for the other 3 meters.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available blood glucose meters show acceptable precision, and any errors (with respect to a laboratory method) are highly unlikely to lead to clinical errors. However, only the CareSens meter achieved a bias of less than 5%.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app