JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, N.I.H., EXTRAMURAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Role of sling integrity in the restoration of leak point pressure in the rat vaginal sling model.

Journal of Urology 2005 August
PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that cutting the sling at its suburethral section does not cancel its anti-incontinence effect. We also examined the long-term effects of the sling on bladder function in a recently validated rat model of vaginal sling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stress urinary incontinence was created in 60 female Sprague-Dawley rats by the previously established method of bilateral pudendal nerve transection. Under anesthesia 20 animals received a vaginal sling, 20 received a vaginal sling in which the suburethral portion of the sling was cut immediately after placement and 20 received a sham vaginal sling. Six weeks after the procedures leak point pressure was determined and a cystometrogram was done using anesthesia in each animal via a previously implanted suprapubic catheter. Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise separate rank multiple comparison tests were performed with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS: The cut and intact slings increased leak point pressure similarly and these values were significantly higher than that of the sham sling (24.9 and 27.9 cm H2O, respectively, vs 20.7, p <0.0001). Peak micturition pressure was not significantly different among the 3 groups, indicating absent bladder outlet obstruction in the sling groups. Bladder compliance was significantly decreased 6 weeks after placement of a cut or intact sling compared with the sham sling (p = 0.007 and 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: An intact suburethral portion is not a requirement for sling effectiveness in the rat model of stress urinary incontinence. However, the sling procedure decreases bladder compliance. This may explain the observed voiding dysfunction associated with sling procedures.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app