Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

4-year prostate specific antigen progression and diagnosis of prostate cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam.

Journal of Urology 2005 August
PURPOSE: The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer investigates the impact of screening on prostate cancer mortality and contributes to a better understanding of available screening tests. The present study evaluates the predictive value of a prostate specific antigen (PSA) increase to PSA 3.0 ng/ml or greater in a 4-year period in men who present with low PSA values (less than 3.0 ng/ml) at first screen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42,376 men were randomized to screening vs control in Rotterdam. Of 6,467 men 5,771 had PSA values of less than 3.0 ng/ml, did not undergo biopsy at baseline and were rescreened after 4 years with PSA 3.0 ng/ml or greater as biopsy indication. PSA progression in a 4-year interscreening interval is evaluated by determining the positive predictive values, detection rates and parameters of aggressiveness of round 2 cancers.

RESULTS: PSA progression to more than 3.0 ng/ml occurred in 0.9%, 9.3% and 48.6% of men who presented with PSA values less than 1.0, 1 to 1.9 and 2 to 2.9 ng/ml, respectively, in round 1. Their respective positive predictive values amounted to 19.0%, 23.8% and 27.9%. Cancer detection rates increased with increasing PSA values in round 1. The distribution of low, moderate and high risk cancers depends on round 2 but not on round 1 PSA ranges.

CONCLUSIONS: PSA progression to the (arbitrary) cutoff value of 3.0 ng/ml and the diagnosis of prostate cancer in round 2 screening with a 4-year interval depends strongly on PSA values at the time of the 1st screen. These observations will be helpful to design future screening procedures. With levels less than 2.0 ng/ml PSA progression to levels of 3.0 ng/ml or greater is rare as it was seen only in 4.8% of all men.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app