Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Small intestinal contrast ultrasonography-based scoring system: a promising approach for the diagnosis and follow-up of celiac disease.

BACKGROUND: Small intestinal ultrasonography with anechoic contrast agents (SICUS) has been shown to have a diagnostic accuracy on small bowel morphology similar to X-ray barium follow-through. Although extremely investigated by transabdominal ultrasonography, celiac disease, a common disorder of the small bowel, has been never studied by SICUS.

AIM: To asses SICUS characteristics of celiac disease patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: SICUS was performed using PEG 4000 as contrast agent. Twenty-three patients with celiac disease at the first diagnosis were enrolled and 30 healthy volunteers, matched for sex and age, were selected as control group. Celiac disease diagnosis was based on anti-gluten, anti-endomysium, and anti-transglutaminase positivity as well as jejunal histology. The following seven echographic parameters were considered: liquid endoluminal content before contrast, loop diameter, Kerckring's folds, peristaltic waves, ileal jejunalization, mesenteric lymphoadenomegaly, and Doppler resistance index (RI) of mesenteric superior artery. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t test for unpaired data; one-way analysis of variance was used to correlate echographic and histologic pictures.

RESULTS: Loop diameter, Kerckring's fold number, peristaltic waves, and Doppler RI appeared to be significantly different between celiac disease patients and controls. Additionally, liquid content, ileal jejunalization, and mesenteric lymphoadenomegaly were present only in the celiacs (52.1%, 47.7%, and 95.6%, respectively), but not in controls. Only Doppler RI values significantly correlated with the histologic degree of damage.

CONCLUSIONS: SICUS could be a reliable and noninvasive technique to confirm a diagnosis of celiac disease performed using conventional investigations. The possibility of investigating the whole small bowel and the safety of repeating examinations could be useful in the follow-up of celiac patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app