Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of convection-enhanced delivery of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of paclitaxel is a new locoregional approach for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) in monitoring the effects of this type of direct drug delivery.

METHODS: Eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma underwent CED of paclitaxel, which was infused over stereotactically placed catheters into the tumour. FET PET and MRI were performed before and 4 weeks after therapy and then at 3-month intervals to document follow-up. For quantitative evaluation, SUV(max)(tumour)/SUV(mean)(background) ratios were calculated.

RESULTS: At baseline all tumours showed gadolinium enhancement and high FET uptake (SUV(max)/BG 3.2+/-0.8). Four weeks after CED, a statistically significant decrease in FET uptake was seen (SUV(max)/BG-17%; p<0.01). During follow-up, no recurrence was observed within the CED area. Two out of eight patients with extended tumours died 4 and 5 months after treatment, most probably from local complications. Temporarily stable disease with stable FET uptake was observed in six of eight patients; this was followed by progression and increasing FET uptake ratios (+46%) distant from the CED area in five of the six patients 3-13 months after CED. One patient still presents stable FET uptake 10 months after CED. MRI showed unchanged/increasing contrast enhancement and oedema without ability to reliably assess disease progression.

CONCLUSION: FET PET is a valuable tool in monitoring the effects of CED of paclitaxel. In long-term follow-up, stable or decreasing FET uptake, even in contrast-enhancing lesions, is suggestive of reactive changes, whereas increasing ratios appear always to be indicative of recurrence. Therefore, FET PET is more reliable than MRI in differentiating stable disease from tumour regrowth.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app