We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Hand-assisted video-thoracoscopy for resection of esophageal cancer].
Zhonghua Wai Ke za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Surgery] 2005 March 16
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and advantages of hand-assisted video-thoracoscopy for resection of esophageal cancer.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with esophageal cancer received hand-assisted video-thoracoscopic esophagectomy (group I). 45 patients underwent esophagectomy through routine open thoracotomy during the same period as control (group II). The data of lymph node resection, operating time and blood loss were compared.
RESULTS: There were no operative mortality in 2 groups. In group I, the number of dissected paraesophageal lymph nodes, cardiac lymph nodes and left gastric nodes were (3.6 +/- 1.0), (1.3 +/- 1.1) and (4.3 +/- 1.4), respectively. While for group II the dissected lymph nodes were (3.3 +/- 1.5), (1.6 +/- 1.1) and (4.7 +/- 2.1), respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). However, the number of dissected mediastinal nodes was (6.6 +/- 3.7) for group I and (3.8 +/- 2.5) for group II (chi(2) = 2.95, P < 0.05). The mean operating time was (29 +/- 5) minutes for group I and (60 +/- 6) minutes for group II. The mean blood loss was (93 +/- 19) ml for group I and (145 +/- 35) ml for group II. The mean chest tube drainage was (201 +/- 45) ml for group I and (295 +/- 57) ml for group II in the first postoperative day. The difference in above parameters between 2 groups was significant (chi(2) = 18.69, 6.13, 6.08, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that hand-assisted video-thoracoscopic esophagectomy is a safer, minimal invasive procedure in the resection of esophagus carcinoma.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with esophageal cancer received hand-assisted video-thoracoscopic esophagectomy (group I). 45 patients underwent esophagectomy through routine open thoracotomy during the same period as control (group II). The data of lymph node resection, operating time and blood loss were compared.
RESULTS: There were no operative mortality in 2 groups. In group I, the number of dissected paraesophageal lymph nodes, cardiac lymph nodes and left gastric nodes were (3.6 +/- 1.0), (1.3 +/- 1.1) and (4.3 +/- 1.4), respectively. While for group II the dissected lymph nodes were (3.3 +/- 1.5), (1.6 +/- 1.1) and (4.7 +/- 2.1), respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). However, the number of dissected mediastinal nodes was (6.6 +/- 3.7) for group I and (3.8 +/- 2.5) for group II (chi(2) = 2.95, P < 0.05). The mean operating time was (29 +/- 5) minutes for group I and (60 +/- 6) minutes for group II. The mean blood loss was (93 +/- 19) ml for group I and (145 +/- 35) ml for group II. The mean chest tube drainage was (201 +/- 45) ml for group I and (295 +/- 57) ml for group II in the first postoperative day. The difference in above parameters between 2 groups was significant (chi(2) = 18.69, 6.13, 6.08, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that hand-assisted video-thoracoscopic esophagectomy is a safer, minimal invasive procedure in the resection of esophagus carcinoma.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app