JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of timing of troponin elevation on clinical outcomes and use of evidence-based therapies for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Matthew T Roe, Eric D Peterson, Charles V Pollack, L Kristin Newby, Yun Li, Robert H Christenson, W Frank Peacock, Francis M Fesmire, Deborah Diercks, J Douglas Kirk, Sidney C Smith, E Magnus Ohman, W Brian Gibler et al.
Annals of Emergency Medicine 2005, 45 (4): 355-62
15795713

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Previous studies in clinical trial populations have demonstrated that patients presenting with positive troponin levels have a higher risk of mortality than patients with later positive troponin levels, but the influence of the timing of troponin elevation has not been previously characterized. We evaluate the impact of the timing of troponin elevation on clinical outcomes and adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association acute care guidelines for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

METHODS: We examined inhospital outcomes and use of acute (<24 hours) medications and invasive cardiac procedures in 23,184 high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (positive cardiac markers or ischemic ST-segment changes) during 2001 to 2002 from 396 US hospitals participating in the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines (CRUSADE) Initiative. Baseline and peak troponin values were recorded and were designated as positive if above the cutoff value used at each institution to designate definite myocardial necrosis.

RESULTS: In the study cohort, 53.2% of patients presented with baseline positive troponin levels, 30.6% had baseline negative/later positive troponin levels, and 16.2% had negative troponin levels during the entire hospitalization. Patients with baseline positive troponin levels had a higher risk of inhospital mortality than patients with baseline negative/later positive troponin levels (6.5% versus 4.1%) and were less likely to undergo early cardiac catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention. The use of acute aspirin (in approximately 91% of patients), heparin (85%), and beta-blockers (78%) was similar in patients with baseline-positive versus later-positive troponin levels.

CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that evidence-based therapies and interventions for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes are underused in patients with elevated troponin levels, but baseline troponin elevations, which are associated with a higher risk of inhospital mortality, do not stimulate more aggressive care.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
15795713
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"