Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the outcomes of aortic valve replacement with 17-mm mechanical prostheses in patients with isolated aortic stenosis.

METHODS: Between January 1997 and January 2003, 35 patients (mean age, 63.4 +/- 17 years; median age, 70 years; age range, 16-84 years) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with a 17-mm St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus (16 [45.7%] patients) or a St Jude Medical Regent prosthesis (19 [54.3%] patients). The paired Student t test or the paired Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare preoperative with follow-up echocardiographic measurements.

RESULTS: Thirty-two (91.4%) patients were female, mean height was 154.4 +/- 8.3 cm, mean weight was 62.2 +/- 9.2 kg, and mean body surface area was 1.59 +/- 0.13 m 2 . The preoperative average New York Heart Association class was 2.8 +/- 0.8. The mean preoperative left ventricular mass index was 135.2 +/- 31 g/m 2 . Preoperative echocardiography showed an average gradient of 65.7 +/- 19.2 mm Hg (mean) and 103.6 +/- 30.7 mm Hg (peak) and a mean indexed effective orifice area of 0.40 +/- 0.1 cm 2 /m 2 . Echocardiographic follow-up time averaged 28.2 +/- 22.7 months (range, 13-72 months). Follow-up was 100% complete (1131.7 patient-months). Hospital mortality was 8.6% (3 patients). Actuarial 5-year survival was 94.7%. The mean postoperative New York Heart Association class was 1.13 +/- 0.34 ( P < .001), with 27 (87.1%) patients in class I and 4 patients in class II. A significant regression of the indexed left ventricular mass was found (postoperative mean value, 107.8 +/- 22.8 g/m 2 ; P < .0001), despite a mean indexed effective orifice area of 0.67 +/- 0.14 cm 2 /m 2 (median, 0.66 cm 2 /m 2 ).

CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with aortic stenosis can experience satisfactory clinical improvement and significant indexed left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with modern small-diameter bileaflet prostheses.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app