We have located links that may give you full text access.
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary London hospital.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2005 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to review all emergency peripartum hysterectomies performed at a tertiary hospital in London, UK, and to identify the risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
METHOD: A retrospective case control study. The cases consisted of all women who had emergency peripartum hysterectomy between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2003. Controls were women who delivered immediately before and after the indexed case. Demographic data, medical and surgical histories, pregnancy, intrapartum and postpartum data were collected. Differences between cases and controls were compared with chi2, Fisher exact and Student t tests. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
RESULTS: There were 15 cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in 31,079 deliveries, giving a rate of 0.48 per 1,000. Women who had emergency peripartum hysterectomy were significantly older (mean age 37 years vs. 29 years, P<0.001) and multiparous (P=0.02). More of the cases had a history of uterine surgery (67 vs. 30%, P=0.01), placenta praevia (60 vs. 3%, P<0.0001) and were delivered by caesarean section (86.7 vs. 30%, P=0.003). Eighty percent of the hysterectomies were performed in the daytime and all were done by consultants. Haemorrhage due to placenta praevia was the main indication for emergency peripartum hysterectomy (47%). Independent risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy were older age (odds ratios [OR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-1.6), multiparity (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-10.2), history of previous caesarean section (OR 13.5, 95% CI 2.7-65.4), caesarean delivery in index pregnancy (OR 11.6, 95% CI 2.1-68.6) and caesarean delivery in index pregnancy for placenta praevia (OR 18, 95% CI 3.6-69).
CONCLUSION: Caesarean deliveries, especially repeat caesareans in women with placenta praevia, significantly increase the risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
METHOD: A retrospective case control study. The cases consisted of all women who had emergency peripartum hysterectomy between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2003. Controls were women who delivered immediately before and after the indexed case. Demographic data, medical and surgical histories, pregnancy, intrapartum and postpartum data were collected. Differences between cases and controls were compared with chi2, Fisher exact and Student t tests. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
RESULTS: There were 15 cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in 31,079 deliveries, giving a rate of 0.48 per 1,000. Women who had emergency peripartum hysterectomy were significantly older (mean age 37 years vs. 29 years, P<0.001) and multiparous (P=0.02). More of the cases had a history of uterine surgery (67 vs. 30%, P=0.01), placenta praevia (60 vs. 3%, P<0.0001) and were delivered by caesarean section (86.7 vs. 30%, P=0.003). Eighty percent of the hysterectomies were performed in the daytime and all were done by consultants. Haemorrhage due to placenta praevia was the main indication for emergency peripartum hysterectomy (47%). Independent risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy were older age (odds ratios [OR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-1.6), multiparity (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-10.2), history of previous caesarean section (OR 13.5, 95% CI 2.7-65.4), caesarean delivery in index pregnancy (OR 11.6, 95% CI 2.1-68.6) and caesarean delivery in index pregnancy for placenta praevia (OR 18, 95% CI 3.6-69).
CONCLUSION: Caesarean deliveries, especially repeat caesareans in women with placenta praevia, significantly increase the risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app