Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of image artifact produced by optical coherence tomography of retinal pathology.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and type of optical coherence tomography (OCT) fast macular thickness map (FMTM) scan artifacts, and whether these artifacts depend on patient diagnosis, demographics, and ocular therapy.

DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS: Records from patients who underwent an ophthalmologic evaluation by a member of the Duke University Eye Center vitreoretinal faculty and had an OCT scan produced by the FMTM protocol between July 7, 2003 and July 31, 2003 were reviewed. The relationships between OCT scan artifacts and ocular diagnosis, ocular treatment, and patient demographics were determined. Logistic regression was used to relate OCT scan artifacts simultaneously with ocular diagnosis and treatment.

RESULTS: Scans from 171 eyes were analyzed. Retinal scan artifacts, though not observed in normal eyes, were identified frequently in eyes with macular pathology (P = .049). Artifacts were observed in 43.2% of all scans, and of these, an erroneous retinal thickness measurement was obtained in 62.2%. Six types of OCT surface map artifacts were observed. Of these, inner and outer retinal misidentification, degraded image artifact, and "off center" artifact were significantly associated with central thickness calculation errors (P < .001). Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), full-thickness macular hole, and photodynamic therapy were all associated with increased artifact (P = .002, .022, and <.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Optical coherence tomography scan artifacts are seen surprisingly frequently, adversely affect retinal thickness measurements in a high proportion of cases, and are diagnosis-dependent. Recognition of these artifacts will improve retinal thickness measurement accuracy, and will prevent faulty treatment decisions that are based on inaccurate retinal thickness measurements.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app