COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Determinants of long-term quality of life and voiding function of patients treated with radical prostatectomy or permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

BJU International 2004 November
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term quality of life (QoL) outcomes of three treatments for localized prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy (RP); brachytherapy monotherapy (BTM); and BT combined with external beam radiotherapy (BTC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In August 2000, questionnaires were mailed to men with T1c-T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with either RP, BTM ((103)Pd monotherapy) or BTC. Questionnaires included validated outcome measures, i.e. the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA-SS), Urinary Function Questionnaire for men after RP, and the Brief Sexual Function Inventory. Returned questionnaires were assessed using cross-sectional analysis.

RESULTS: Data from 214 patients were included in the analysis (60 RP, 102 BTM and 52 BTC); the median follow-up was 18.8, 25.5 and 29.9 months, respectively. There were differences between both BT groups and the RP group in total AUA-SS and obstructive subscale symptom scores, with the former having worse symptom scores at a longer follow-up. Differences in overall QoL were not detected between groups using the total FACT-G but the BTC group generally had worse scores in the physical well-being subscale. The BT groups had higher continence rates with time after treatment. Sexual function was better with BT initially, but these differences did not persist at a longer follow-up. There were significant correlations between the FACT-G and the urinary symptom scores, and the degree of sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS: Although patients treated with BTM and RP have a different spectrum of side-effects, their overall long-term QoL is similar, with urinary and sexual function being the primary determinants of this outcome. Men treated with BTC have a worse QoL.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app