JOURNAL ARTICLE

Ventilatory response to exercise and kinetics of oxygen recovery are similar in cardiac transplant recipients and patients with mild chronic heart failure

Serafim N Nanas, John V Terrovitis, Christos Charitos, Ourania Papazachou, Zafiria Margari, Eleftheria P Tsagalou, Christos Kassiotis, Elias Tsolakis, Savas Toumanidis, John N Nanas
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2004, 23 (10): 1154-9
15477108

BACKGROUND: Exercise capacity, assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill testing (CPET), does not return to normal following heart transplantation. This study evaluated the ventilatory response to exercise and the kinetics of oxygen (O(2)) recovery in heart transplant recipients (HTR) compared to healthy volunteers (HV) and heart failure patients.

METHODS: Eighteen patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF), 12 with mild heart failure (MHF) matched for peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)) with the HTR, 12 HTR and 12 HV underwent CPET for measurements of peak Vo(2), Vo(2) at anaerobic threshold (AT), first-degree slope of Vo(2) decline during early recovery (Vo(2)/t-slope), time required for a 50% fall from peak Vo(2) (T(1/2) of Vo(2)) and the slopes of VE/Vco(2) and VE/Vo(2).

RESULTS: The MHF and HTR groups had similar ventilatory responses to exercise and O(2) recovery kinetics. Peak Vo(2) (18.5 +/- 5.7 vs 9.4 +/- 0.9 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001), AT (13.8 +/- 4.8 vs 6.7 +/- 1.8 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001) and Vo(2)/t-slope (0.6 +/- 0.2 vs 0.3 +/- 0.2 liter/min/min, p = 0.055) were higher in the HTR than in the ESHF group. In contrast, HTR had lower VE/Vco(2)-slope (31.4 +/- 3.8 vs 39.2 +/- 9.9, p = 0.015) and T(1/2) Vo(2) (1.5 +/- 0.3 vs 2.4 +/- 1.1 minute, p = 0.014) than the ESHF group. Compared to HV, HTR had lower Vo(2) peak (18.5 +/- 5.7 vs 28.4 +/- 6.9 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001), AT (13.8 +/- 4.8 vs 19.8 +/- 4.5 ml/kg/min, p = 0.04), Vo(2)/t-slope (0.6 +/- 0.2 vs 1.0 +/- 0.4 liter/min/min, p = 0.005) and steeper VE/Vco(2) slope (31.4 +/- 3.8 vs 23.6 +/- 2.7, p = 0.062). Heart rate deceleration during recovery was significantly slower in HTR than in all other groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Exercise intolerance and delayed O(2) recovery kinetics were only partially reversed after heart transplantation. This finding suggests that some of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of heart failure persist after heart transplantation.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
15477108
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"