Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative hemodynamic depression of halothane versus isoflurane in neonates and infants: an echocardiographic study.

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the relationship of cardiovascular depression and dose during equal potent levels of halothane and isoflurane anesthesia in neonates (n = 19) (16.7 +/- 6.9 days) and infants (n = 54) (6.1 +/- 3.1 mo). Seventy-three children had heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and pulsed Doppler pulmonary blood flow velocity as well as two-dimensional echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular area and length recorded just before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced by inhalation of increasing inspired concentrations of halothane or isoflurane in oxygen using a pediatric circle system and mask. During controlled ventilation, halothane and isoflurane concentrations were adjusted to maintain 1.0 MAC and then 1.5 MAC (corrected for age), and echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements were repeated. A final cardiovascular measurement was recorded after intravenous administration of 0.02 mg/kg of atropine. All measurements were completed before tracheal intubation and the start of elective surgery. In neonates, 1.0 MAC concentrations of halothane and isoflurane decreased cardiac output (74% +/- 16%), stroke volume (75% +/- 15%), and ejection fraction (76% +/- 15%) similarly from awake levels. Decreases in cardiac output, stroke volume, and ejection fraction with halothane and isoflurane were significantly larger at 1.5 MAC (approximately 35% decreases from awake values) than at 1.0 MAC. Heart rate decreased significantly during 1.5 MAC halothane anesthesia (94% +/- 4%) but remained unchanged during isoflurane anesthesia. In infants, 1.0 MAC halothane and isoflurane decreased cardiac output (83% +/- 12%), stroke volume (78% +/- 12%), and ejection fraction (74% +/- 12%) when compared with awake measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app