We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comparative hemodynamic depression of halothane versus isoflurane in neonates and infants: an echocardiographic study.
Anesthesia and Analgesia 1992 March
The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the relationship of cardiovascular depression and dose during equal potent levels of halothane and isoflurane anesthesia in neonates (n = 19) (16.7 +/- 6.9 days) and infants (n = 54) (6.1 +/- 3.1 mo). Seventy-three children had heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and pulsed Doppler pulmonary blood flow velocity as well as two-dimensional echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular area and length recorded just before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced by inhalation of increasing inspired concentrations of halothane or isoflurane in oxygen using a pediatric circle system and mask. During controlled ventilation, halothane and isoflurane concentrations were adjusted to maintain 1.0 MAC and then 1.5 MAC (corrected for age), and echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements were repeated. A final cardiovascular measurement was recorded after intravenous administration of 0.02 mg/kg of atropine. All measurements were completed before tracheal intubation and the start of elective surgery. In neonates, 1.0 MAC concentrations of halothane and isoflurane decreased cardiac output (74% +/- 16%), stroke volume (75% +/- 15%), and ejection fraction (76% +/- 15%) similarly from awake levels. Decreases in cardiac output, stroke volume, and ejection fraction with halothane and isoflurane were significantly larger at 1.5 MAC (approximately 35% decreases from awake values) than at 1.0 MAC. Heart rate decreased significantly during 1.5 MAC halothane anesthesia (94% +/- 4%) but remained unchanged during isoflurane anesthesia. In infants, 1.0 MAC halothane and isoflurane decreased cardiac output (83% +/- 12%), stroke volume (78% +/- 12%), and ejection fraction (74% +/- 12%) when compared with awake measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app