ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Invasive prenatal diagnosis in the Netherlands, 1991-2000: number of procedures, indications and abnormal results detected].

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of invasive prenatal diagnosis in the Netherlands during the period 1991-2000 and to analyse potential trends.

DESIGN: Retrospective.

METHOD: The annual results from all 13 Dutch centres for invasive prenatal diagnosis over the period 1991-2000 were combined and described, with particular emphasis on indications, number and type of invasive procedures, and number and type of abnormal results.

RESULTS: The percentage of pregnancies in which invasive prenatal diagnostics were carried out increased from 5% in 1991 to 6% in 1996 and remained at the same level until 2000. 'Maternal age' was the main reason for prenatal testing (69.2-73.3% of procedures). However, the number of pregnant women aged 36 or over increased by 69.9%. An abnormal result was found in an average of 4.7% of procedures, rising from 3.6% in 1991 to 5.4% in 2000. In 70.8% of cases with abnormal results, the pregnancy was terminated. Important trends were the relative decrease of cordocentesis (-82%) and chorionic villi biopsy (-18%) in favour of amniocentesis (+48%), and a strong decrease in the number of amniocentesis procedures on indication of increased risk of neural tube defect.

CONCLUSION: The total number of invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures remained stable. However, there was an important decrease in the percentage of pregnant women aged 36 or over who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis without previous prenatal screening.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app