JOURNAL ARTICLE

CYFRA 21-1 and CEA are independent prognostic factors in 153 operated stage I NSCLC patients

Thomas Muley, Hendrik Dienemann, Werner Ebert
Anticancer Research 2004, 24 (3): 1953-6
15274383
Currently, no further therapy in addition to surgery is recommended in completely resected NSCLC stage I patients. However, the 5-year survival rate at this stage has been reported to be approximately 60%, i.e. 40% of patients had a lower survival rate. The aim of the study was to identify those patients at increased risk by using the tumor markers CYFRA21-1 and CEA as prognostic factors. One hundred and fifty-three stage I NSCLC patients, who were treated exclusively by surgery between 1996 and 1998, entered this retrospective study. It was shown, by multivariate analysis, that elevated CYFRA 21-1 (>3.3ng/ml) and CEA (>9.8ng/ml) levels were associated with a worse outcome in 21.3% and 13.1% of the patients under study, respectively. The corresponding 3-year survival rates were found to be 60.2% for increased CYFRA 21-1 levels (p=0.029) and approximately 40% for increased CEA levels (p=0.022), compared to a rate of 78.4% and 79.0% in case of normal marker levels, respectively. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) was found to be 2.156 (1.08-4.29) for elevated CYFRA 21-1 and 2.707 (1.15-6.36) for elevated CEA. The detection rate for the identification of patients with worse outcome increased when a combination of both markers was used. Thereby, it was possible to identify 32% of patients where one or both markers were elevated. The 3-year survival rate was 55.7% in this group compared to that of 82.5% in those patients where both markers were in the normal range (p=0.0014). In order to consider the degree of marker elevation that is thought to reflect tumor burden, we introduced a tumor marker index (TMI) corresponding to the geometric mean of normalized CYFRA21-1 and CEA levels (marker value divided by diagnostic cut-off). Thereby, we were able to identify 3 groups of patients at different risk levels: the first group (22.7%) had a 3-year survival rate of 96.7%, the second group (42.6%) had one of 77.2% and the third group (34.7%) had one of only 55.7%. In conclusion, elevated CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels were able to identify a group of curatively operated NSCLC patients who were at high risk of early death. Those patients may benefit from more aggressive treatment approaches. The group of patients with a 3-year survival rate of 96.7% probably does not need further treatment.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
15274383
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"