Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Increased success rate with infraclavicular brachial plexus block using a dual-injection technique.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that dual injection of the local anesthetic in coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block might enhance both sensory and motor block for anesthesia of the upper limb when compared with a single-injection technique.

DESIGN: Comparative, prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study.

SETTING: University-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS: 60 patients scheduled for surgery of the hand, forearm, or elbow.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a coracoid infraclavicular block guided by nerve stimulator with a single injection technique (Group 1) or a dual-injection technique (Group 2). Injection of 40 mL 1.5% mepivacaine was made after eliciting one evoked motor response in the upper limb with a nerve stimulator for coracoid infraclavicular block in Group 1 and injection of two separate doses of 20 mL 1.5% mepivacaine after elicitation of two motor responses in Group 2.

MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of sensory and motor block in the upper limb 5 and 20 minutes after the end of the injection of the local anesthetic. The time needed to elicit the second response and to inject the second dose of local anesthetic was also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS: Significantly higher rates of sensory block to pinprick on the distributions of axillary, musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, and medial cutaneous of the forearm nerves were found in Group 2 at 20 minutes. Significantly higher rates of motor block for arm, wrist, and hand movements were found in Group 2 at 20 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS: Dual injection of local anesthetic guided by nerve stimulator increases the efficacy of coracoid block when compared with a single injection of the same dose of local anesthetic.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app