ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Potentializing of tricyclics and serotoninergics by thyroid hormones in resistant depressive disorders].

L'Encéphale 2004 May
In response to the increase of resistant depressive disorders and in spite of improved treatments, numerous studies were conducted in the last thirty Years aiming at assessing the pre-morbid thyroid state of depressed patients resistant to well conducted tricyclic treatments. "Minimal" thyroid abnormalities were evidenced as well as central thyroid disorders which may not be detected by peripheral-i.e plasmatic- dosages. Regarding the premorbid thyroid status, the hypothesis of subclinical hypothyroidism was considered by many Authors. It is marked by four grades including T3 and T4 decreased levels, basal TSH concentration abnormalities as well as increased TSH response to TRH stimulation, and the presence of antimicrosomal and antithyroglobulin antibodies. Although, there are different views on the existence or not of these abnormalities, we'll focus our attention on a metaanalysis including six studies. It shows in a population with a resistant depression, 52% of patients with subclinical hypothyroidism, against 8 to 17% in patients with simple depression and 5% in the overall population.Similarly, antithyroid antibody levels (group IV hypothyroidism) were significantly higher in depressed patients (9% to 20% against 7,5% in the overall population). For many Years, a central hypothyroidism was hypothesized on the basis of an exhausted T3-T4 transference mechanism and a lowered TRH hypothalamic biodisponibility.In the last Years, new data emerged on the role of transthyretin, a cerebral carrier T4 protein, whose concentration in the CSF was found significantly lower in depressed patients than in a control group, the lowest levels being observed in the most severely depressed. This decreased level of transthyretin would result in a lower central T4 biodisponibility-hence, in view of a T4-T3 desiodation insufficiency, a T3 deficit is observed. A low transthyretin level associated or not to subclinical hypothyroidism could be a factor of depressive vulnerability on one hand, of resistance to tricyclic treatment on the other one. Conversely, subclinical hypothyroidism could be a predictive factor of a good response to a potentializing strategy. The pharmacological mechanisms involved in this potentializing phenomenon are now well known: they consist in an interaction between depression, adrenergic receptors and thyroid hormones biodisponibility. The decreased norepinephrine level observed in depressive patients is associated, in case of increased thyroid hormones biodisponibility, with a higher sensitivity of adre-nergic receptors, mostly betaadrenergic. This seems to underly the recovery process. According to some Authors, the serotoninergic system might be involved in the potentialization of tricyclics by thyroid hormones. We know that in animals with hypothyroidism, the serotonin synthesis is decreased and that the administration of T3 increases the brain levels of serotonin and its 5HIA catabolite. In addition, T3 could correct the down-regulation induced by serotoninergics on beta-adrenergic receptors. On the basis of numerous studies carried out on the potentializing of tricyclics, we suggest practical modalities of treatment - which until today did not materialize in every day practice in the absence of a clear consensus based on statistically reliable data: after four to six weeks of inefficient tricyclic or serotoninergic treatment on a correct dosage testified by plasmatic dosages, it is recommended to initiate a T3 treatment on a effective posology (25 to 50 micrograms per day), which must be reached in 2 or 3 days, except in case of rare and transitory side effects (sweating, shaking, tachycardia, nervousness, anxiety). If the treatment is not rapidly efficient, it must be discontinued in case there is no improvement after 3 weeks. Until today, there is no consensus about the duration of a T3 treatment. It is important to take into account the predictive criteria of good or bad response to a T3 potentialization, since they have direct consequences on the management of depressed patients. For example, a high degree of chronic evolution with resistance to numerous treatments, associated disorders according to the DSM IV axis I and a comorbidity of addiction, point to a bad prognosis of a potentialization treatment. In addition, we'll examine the few recent studies on the potentializing of serotoninergic antidepressant drugs by thyroid hormones.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app