We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Membrane and capillary blood components of diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide in pulmonary sarcoidosis: relation to exercise gas exchange.
Chest 2004 June
BACKGROUND: Resting pulmonary diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is known to be the best predictor of arterial desaturation during exercise in patients with sarcoidosis. However, the relative contribution of each of the two components of DLCO-alveolar membrane diffusing capacity (Dm) and pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc)-remains unclear.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate which component is responsible for the decrease of resting DLCO in patients with sarcoidosis, and to determine which resting pulmonary function test, including Dm and Vc, is the best predictor of gas exchange abnormalities during submaximal exercise.
DESIGN: Prospective analysis of patients referred to our department of respiratory medicine.
PATIENTS: Twenty four patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis were separated into two groups according to chest radiographic findings: group 1, stages 2 and 3 (n = 15); group 2, stage 4 (n = 9). All the patients completed pulmonary function tests (flows, volumes, single-breath DLCO, transfer coefficient [Ka], Dm, Vc) and submaximal exercise (two steady-state levels of mild and moderate exercise corresponding respectively to a target oxygen consumption of approximately 10 to 15 mL/min/kg).
RESULTS: DLCO was reduced in the two groups (group 1, 63 +/- 16% of predicted; group 2, 64 +/- 16% of predicted). Dm was severely decreased (group 1, 58 +/- 24% of predicted; group 2, 51 +/- 15% of predicted), whereas Vc was unchanged or only mildly decreased (group 1, 81 +/- 18% of predicted; group 2, 85 +/- 28% of predicted). Whatever the group of patients and the exercise level, Dm and DLCO were the strongest predictors (p < 0.001) of gas exchange abnormalities. Ka or volumes were weak predictors, and Vc or flows were not related with exercise gas exchange.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a decrease in Dm mostly accounts for resting DLCO reduction, and that Dm as well as DLCO are highly predictive of gas exchange abnormalities at exercise in patients with sarcoidosis.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate which component is responsible for the decrease of resting DLCO in patients with sarcoidosis, and to determine which resting pulmonary function test, including Dm and Vc, is the best predictor of gas exchange abnormalities during submaximal exercise.
DESIGN: Prospective analysis of patients referred to our department of respiratory medicine.
PATIENTS: Twenty four patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis were separated into two groups according to chest radiographic findings: group 1, stages 2 and 3 (n = 15); group 2, stage 4 (n = 9). All the patients completed pulmonary function tests (flows, volumes, single-breath DLCO, transfer coefficient [Ka], Dm, Vc) and submaximal exercise (two steady-state levels of mild and moderate exercise corresponding respectively to a target oxygen consumption of approximately 10 to 15 mL/min/kg).
RESULTS: DLCO was reduced in the two groups (group 1, 63 +/- 16% of predicted; group 2, 64 +/- 16% of predicted). Dm was severely decreased (group 1, 58 +/- 24% of predicted; group 2, 51 +/- 15% of predicted), whereas Vc was unchanged or only mildly decreased (group 1, 81 +/- 18% of predicted; group 2, 85 +/- 28% of predicted). Whatever the group of patients and the exercise level, Dm and DLCO were the strongest predictors (p < 0.001) of gas exchange abnormalities. Ka or volumes were weak predictors, and Vc or flows were not related with exercise gas exchange.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a decrease in Dm mostly accounts for resting DLCO reduction, and that Dm as well as DLCO are highly predictive of gas exchange abnormalities at exercise in patients with sarcoidosis.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app