Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid characteristics in acute and chronic lung transplant rejection.

BACKGROUND: The detection of graft rejection by bronchoalveolar lavage remains controversial.

METHODS: To assess the value of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in acute and chronic rejection after lung transplantation we analyzed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cellular differential characteristics, lymphocyte sub-types and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) cytokine levels in patients with exclusively either acute rejection (n = 37) or bronchiolitis obliterans (BO; n = 48). Both groups were compared with a control group of lung transplantation patients without rejection or infection, matched for the time the lavage was performed after lung transplantation.

RESULTS: The bronchiolitis obliterans group showed marked neutrophilia, high IL-8 and higher CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD8(+)CD45(+) bronchoalveolar lavage fluid levels when compared with their stable controls. When using a cut-off point of >3% neutrophils in the lavage, the sensitivity for BO is 87.0%, the specificity 77.6%. The sensitivity of IL-8 for BO when using a cut-off point of >71.4 pg/ml is 74.5%, the specificity 83.3%. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in acute rejection was characterized by marked lymphocytosis, but showed no difference when compared with stable controls in any of the lymphocyte sub-types studied. When using a cut-off point of <==1% lymphocytes in the lavage, the sensitivity for acute rejection (AR) is 40.4%, the specificity 95.6%. The marked neutrophilia, high IL-8 cytokine level and more activated lymphocyte population in bronchiolitis obliterans may indicate ongoing local allograft rejection.

CONCLUSIONS: In the present study we were not able to show any difference in lymphocyte sub-types when comparing acute rejection and control subjects. Cellular and soluble parameters in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid appear useful for diagnosing bronchiolitis obliterans.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app